In January 2015, a class action lawsuit against Rust-Oleum Corporation was consolidated in federal court in Chicago, Illinois. The suit asserts that the company misrepresented its Restore products and failed to disclose information about its functions. The manufacturer agreed to settle the case for $9.3 million after a large number of consumers filing class-action lawsuits. Some of the claims are unsubstantiated, and the case is pending.
The lawsuits claim that Rust-Oleum sold Restore products to thousands of unsuspecting consumers without fully testing them or addressing the problems associated with the products. It is alleged that the company failed to warn consumers about the potential dangers of Restore products and overcharged consumers for the product. Ultimately, consumers are entitled to compensation for their losses, but it is unclear how much of a settlement Rust-Oleum will ultimately payout.
The Rust-Oleum Restore lawsuit claims that the manufacturer misrepresented the product and concealed the defects that resulted from improper use.
Allen Garrard, a plaintiff in the suit, claims that he should have received a much higher price or not purchased the Restore products in the first place. This case is pending in the Northern District of Illinois. In the meantime, you can still file a claim against Rust-Oleum.
The Rust-Oleum Restore lawsuit alleges that the company failed to properly warn customers that its Restore product would prematurely peel, chip, or degrade after applying it. The manufacturer knew or should have known that the product would not live up to its promise, according to the plaintiffs’ lawyers. Whether or not you have the right to sue the manufacturer for these defects is the only question.
This lawsuit asserts that Rust-Oleum knowingly sold defective Restore products to consumers.
The company was aware of the defects and warned consumers to remove them before applying the product. It was later advised to remove the product from concrete areas. It was not recommended to use the Restore treatment. It will not work well in such a situation. Consequently, a lawsuit claiming this product’s defects is being filed in the Northern District of Illinois.
Although the Rust-Oleum Restore product is still on the market, it was pulled from shelves in 2015. After consumers filed the lawsuit, Rust-Oleum was required to stop making it. The company has not yet settled the case, but it will compensate all purchasers of Restore products. The class action is pending in the Northern District of Illinois. If you have any of the following complaints, you may be able to win.
The Rust-Oleum Restore lawsuit was filed after the manufacturer’s product failed to deliver as promised. Many people have complained of peeling paint. The coating was not applied properly. The Rust-Oleum Recreate 10x has also been recalled by consumer reports. If you purchased this product, you are in luck. The settlement will cover the costs related to the defective product.
As a class-action lawsuit, Rust-Oleum has admitted that its Restore products do not provide the long-lasting protection that they claim they do.
As a result, a Rust-Oleum Restore 10x lawsuit alleges that the product has a defect that causes the deck or patio to peel. It fails to adhere to the underlying surface and prematurely degrades, leaving the deck looking worse than it was before the Rust-Oleum Restore treatment.
As the Rust-Oleum Restore products are defective, consumers who bought them can file a lawsuit against the company. The lawsuit is based on the claims made in the Class Action. However, the product should not be removed from the shelves. This is why the Rust-Oleum Re-store 10x is not working properly. It is also contaminated with the chemicals used in the Restore treatment. The chemical-based treatment on the deck and in the Restore 10x are harmful to the environment.
The Rust-Oleum Restore 10x lawsuit was filed against the manufacturer in August 2017. The product was defective in terms of its quality and its ability to protect concrete surfaces. Unlike other paints, the Restore products are not as durable as they are supposed to be. The plaintiffs, in this case, we’re unable to recover damages because the paint chipped and dissolved. These cases were not resolved by the Rust-Oleum Restore product.